Belinda Randall

Author's details

Name: Belinda Randall
Date registered: 24 March 2015

Latest posts

  1. Section 6 – farewell (and good riddance!) — 17 July 2017
  2. The world catches up to securities class actions — 26 February 2017
  3. Senate Signs off on Financial Adviser Reforms – Changes to Claim Volume/Risk Profile Ahead? — 21 February 2017
  4. To walk away or not to walk away – what is a genuine offer to compromise? — 13 December 2016
  5. Insurer unable to deny third party liability claim for jet ski accident – section 54 strikes again — 24 November 2016

Author's posts listings

Federal Court Changes the Playing Field on ‘Agreed’ Civil Penalties in Regulatory Proceedings

The very recent decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court (handed down on 1 May 2015) in Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v CFMEU [2015] FCAFC 59 has changed the law in relation to the Court’s approach to ‘agreed’ penalties in civil penalty proceedings. This decision is likely to be highly relevant to …

Continue reading »

Proceeds of Crime Proceeding Against former Gunns Chairman Stalls Over Penalty Dispute

The hearing of the proceeds of crime proceeding against John Gay has been deferred following a decision by Eastcourt J in the Supreme Court of Tasmania on 20 April 2015 regarding the basis upon which any penalty ought to be calculated. To read the decision, please click here.

Continue reading »

Getting the Court seal of approval of class action settlements – Victorian Supreme Court confirms the test

Justice Croft of the Victorian Supreme Court has confirmed and clarified the task before a court in the approval of a group proceeding (class action) settlement application in a recent decision which approved the settlement of the Great Southern Victorian proceedings: Peter Clarke & Ors v Great Southern Finance & Ors [2014] VSC 516 (11 …

Continue reading »

Grant-Taylor v Babcock & Brown – causation and proof of loss in shareholder actions

The Federal Court has weighed into the debate about causation and proof of loss in shareholder actions in its decision of Grant-Taylor v Babcock & Brown Limited (in liquidation) [2015] FCA 149 (4 March 2015). Significantly, Justice Perram has entertained the possibility that shareholders or investors may be able to claim losses in circumstances where …

Continue reading »

No policy, no invoice, no premium – but insurer on risk

Imprecise and incomplete communications between a broker and an insurer has led to an insurer being found on risk even though, as the judge observed: “No policy was prepared; no invoice was sent; no premium was paid.” In late 2007, Leading Synthetics instructed its broker, Austbrokers, to get a policy against the risk that one …

Continue reading »

» Newer posts