- Posted by Michael McKee
- On 2 March 18
- Derivatives, EEA, Europe, FCA, Financial Regulation, Inducements, LEIs, MiFID II, MiFIR, Position Limits, Quote Obligations, Research, Technical Standards, Trading Obligation
The below article is reproduced from the February 2018 edition of Exchange – International magazine. For more about financial services regulatory issues across the world, the full magazine is available for download here
The second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65) (MiFID II) came into force on 3 January 2018, alongside the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (600/2014) (MiFIR). Both pieces of legislation set out the framework of requirements for investments firms operating in the EEA and are aimed at achieving more transparency and greater protection for investors.
This article examines some of the key developments which took place in the run-up to the implementation date as well as the ongoing workstreams in relation to MiFID II and MiFIR.
EUROPEAN IMPLEMENTATION OF MIFID II
European Commission FAQs on MiFID II inducements and research reforms
On 26 October 2017, the European Commission (Commission) published a set of FAQs on the application of MiFID II to third country broker-dealers in order to assist MiFID II portfolio managers and their third country sub-advisors with implementation of MiFID II in a cross-border context. The FAQs reflect the Commission’s position and do not constitute authoritative interpretation of EU legislation but are likely to be followed as it is expected to be some time before any more authoritative interpretation is given.
The FAQs have been published following discussions between the Commission, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other non-EU jurisdictions, after UK market participants raised concerns with the FCA that, as MiFID II comes into effect, they would be unable to continue to access research in non-EU jurisdictions and comply with the MiFID II requirements.
Following discussions with the Commission, the SEC has also published a related press release providing information about no-action letters it issued to facilitate the cross-border implementation of the MiFID II research provisions.
The FCA published a statement welcoming the announcements of the Commission and SEC. It explained that the announcements enable arrangements that comply with MiFID II and other jurisdictions’ rules, while allowing EU firms’ continued access to research produced by US and other non-EU jurisdictions.
MiFID II technical standards published
On 26 October, two sets of technical standards required under MiFID and MiFID II were published in the Official Journal of the EU (OJ).
- Authorisation of investment firms:
Commission Delegated Regulation 2017/1943 contains regulatory technical standards (RTS) on information and requirements for the authorisation of investment firms. The RTS, developed under Article 7(4) of MiFID II, contain a harmonised list of information investment firms will have to submit to be authorised. They also set out the requirements applicable to the management of certain investment firms and the requirements imposed on shareholders and members with qualifying holdings.
Commission Implementing Regulation 20 I 7/1945 contains implementing technical standards (ITS) with regard to notifications by the applicant firms and communication between the competent authorities and investment firms. The ITS, made under Article 7(5) of MiFID II, contain standard forms, templates and procedures for the notification or provision of information concerning applications for authorisation.
- Acquisitions of qualifying holdings in investment firms:
Commission Delegated Regulation 2017/1946, made under Article 10a(8) of MiFID and Article 12(8) of MiFID II, contains RTS on an exhaustive list of information to be submitted by proposed acquirers in the notification of a proposed acquisition of a qualifying holding in an investment firm. The proposed acquirer will be required to submit information, including the identity of acquirer and any persons that will effectively direct the business of the target entity, details of the acquisition and its financing and the new proposed group structure and its impact on supervision.
Commission Implementing Regulation 2017/1944 contains ITS concerning the notification of a proposed acquisition of a qualifying holding in investment firms. The ITS were developed by the Commission under Article 10a(8) of MiFID and Article 12(9) of MiFID II. They lay down the standard forms, templates and procedures for the exchange of information between the competent authorities of the target and proposed acquirer.
All of the four Regulations listed above entered into force on 15 November 2017.
European Commission Equivalence Decisions
In December 2018, the Commission published two equivalence decisions to ensure that businesses and markets could continue to operate smoothly and without disruptions after 3 January 2018, when MiFID II and MiFIR became effective.
On 5 December 2017, the European Commission adopted an Implementing Decision on the equivalence of the legal and supervisory frameworks applicable to designated contract markets (DSMs) and swap execution facilities (SEFs) in the US under Article 28(4) of MiFIR. The legal and supervisory framework of the US applicable to DSMs and SEFs was considered by the Commission to be equivalent to the requirements laid down in MiFIR for trading venues. The Decision was published in the OJ on 6 December 2017 and entered into force on the next day.
The joint statement (Statement) issued by the European Commission and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) explains that the US Decision allows EU counterparties to trade derivative instruments that are subject to the trading obligation on CFTC-authorised DCMs and SEFs in the US. This decision does not affect the ability of EU counterparties to continue to trade on any CFTC-authorised SEF or DCM with respect to those derivatives which are not subject to the EU’s trading obligation.
On 21 December 2017, the Commission adopted an Implementing Decision on the equivalence of the legal and supervisory framework applicable to stock exchanges in Switzerland (Swiss Decision) in accordance with Article 25(4)(a) of MiFID II. The Commission considered the legal and supervisory framework applicable to stock exchanges in Switzerland to be equivalent to the relevant EU requirements. SIX Swiss Exchange AG and BX Swiss AG are now considered equivalent to MiFID II regulated markets. This Decision is of limited duration and will expire on 31 December 2018 unless the Commission extends it prior to that date.
The Commission also explained that Switzerland differs in a number of ways from other jurisdictions that have been granted equivalence. The scope of this decision is much greater because the trading of Swiss shares in the EU (and vice versa) is more widespread than with the other jurisdictions that were recently recognised. As a result, “trading in Switzerland will have a bigger and more immediate impact on the integrity of EU financial markets, including regarding the prevention of market abuse”.
ESMA statement on delaying the implementation of LEIs
On 20 December 2017, ESMA published a statement on the introduction of LEI requirements. The statement postpones the full application of the rules for six months, subject to certain conditions.
Under the rules introduced in MiFID II, EU investment firms will be prohibited from providing certain services to clients until the LEI code for that client has been obtained by the client. Similarly, EU trading venues will have to identify every issuer of financial instruments traded on them with an LEI code. In order to support the smooth introduction of the LEI requirements, ESMA is going to allow investment firms and trading venues to comply with a lighter set of requirements for a period of six months.
Investment firms will be able to provide services to clients without LEIs if they obtain the necessary documents from those clients to apply for an LEI code on their behalf, and the trading venues will be allowed to report their own LEI codes instead of LEI codes of non-EU issuers currently not having their own LEI codes.
To put these temporary arrangements in place, the FCA is required to change a validation rule in its transaction reporting system. In its response to ESMA’s statement, the FCA explained that it will make the required amendments as soon as possible, but was not able to do so before 3 January 2018, the date the requirements began to apply.
Delegated Regulation under MiFIR relating to trading obligation for derivatives
On 22 December 2017, Commission Delegated Regulation 2017/2417 supplementing MiFIR with regard to RTS on the trading obligation for certain derivatives was published in the OJ.
Article 28 of MiFIR introduces a trading obligation for derivatives. It requires that derivative contracts which are subject to the trading obligation may only be traded on a regulated market, multilateral trading facility, organised trading facility or third-country trading venue deemed to be equivalent by the Commission. Article 32(1) of MiFIR required ESMA to develop RTS specifying the derivatives that should be subject to the trading obligation and the date or dates from which this trading obligation must take effect.
ESMA submitted the draft RTS to the Commission in September 2017, which adopted the RTS in a Delegated Regulation on 17 November 2017, listing the relevant derivatives in its Annex. Neither the European Parliament or the Council of the EU raised objections to the Delegated Regulation, which entered into force on 23 December 2017.
ESMA consults on systematic internalisers’ quote obligations
On 9 November 2017, ESMA published a consultation paper on the proposed amendment of article 10 of Delegated Regulation 2017/587 (RTS I). The consultation paper also addressed some other amendments to RTS 1 to enable a more consistent and unambiguous application of its provisions.
ESMA was required under article 14(7) of MiFIR to draft RTS to specify, with regard to the quoting obligation for SIs, “the determination of whether prices reflect prevailing market conditions”. ESMA’s draft RTS were endorsed by the European Commission and published in the OJ in March 2017.
ESMA later considered whether SIs’ quotes “should under certain circumstances reflect the same minimum price increments as orders and quotes submitted to trading venues trading for the same financial instrument”. ESMA took the view that, in order to ensure that SIs’ quotes adequately reflect prevailing market conditions, it may be necessary to link them to the minimum tick sizes applicable to trading venues.
The consultation closed on 25 January 2018, and ESMA intends to use the input from stakeholders to finalise the amendments to RTS I.
UK IMPLEMENTATION OF MIFID II
FCA published position limits for commodity derivative contracts
On 18 October, the FCA published a webpage containing position limits for commodity derivatives. The FCA is required under MiFID II to set limits on the maximum size of positions held by a person together with those held on its behalf at an aggregate group level. The webpage lists some of the commodity derivative contracts which the FCA has identified as trading on a UK trading venue, including the entries for bespoke contracts and de minimis aggregated contracts.
The position limits apply as of 3 January 2018. The FCA notes that these may be revised if it decides it is necessary to do so or as a result of an ESMA Opinion.
FCA “Dear CEO” letter on payment for order flow
In the letter, the FCA expressed its view that the practice of brokers demanding “payments from counterparties as a condition for conducting client business with them substantially undermines a broker’s ability to act as a good agent”. It also repeated its concerns that PFOF arrangements are (i) bad for markets, (ii) undermine the transparency and efficiency of price formation, (iii) inhibit competition and (iv) lead to poor outcomes for end clients. The regulator further stated that firms continuing to charge PFOF will be in breach of MiFID II standards and highlighted that action had to be taken in order to ensure compliance.
The market intelligence gathered by the FCA suggested that some brokers were designing structures to avoid the rules introduced by MiFID II and provided examples of such structures. The FCA stated that “Mills will be a priority area of supervisory focus after January” and warned against any attempts to circumvent the requirements. Furthermore, the FCA stated that any market makers offered to enter into arrangements that attempt to avoid complying with the rules should not only decline to do so but also notify the FCA of these attempts.
MiFID II — Implementation status of member states
For reference, we have included a table setting out the implementation position for MiFID II in our key European jurisdictions. If you require any additional information on those countries listed below please refer to your local DLA Piper contact below.
|Denmark||Implemented||Denmark has, since 3 January 2018, implemented MiFID II through the Capital Markets Act (in Danish: lov om kapitalmarkeder), the Financial Business Act (in Danish: lov om finansiel virksomhed) and the Financial Advisors Act (in Danish: lov om finansielle rådgivere og boligkreditformidlere).|
|Finland||Implemented||Finland has implemented MiFID II / MiFIR into Finnish law by amending the Investment Services Act through the Law on amendments of Investment Services Act (Fi: Laki sijoituspalvelulain muuttamisesta, 1069/2017) and by repealing the current Act on Trading in Financial Instruments and enacting a new act by the same name (Act on Trading in Financial Instruments (Fi: Laki kaupankäynnistä rahoitusvälineillä 1070/2017).
Both laws entered into force on 3rd January, 2018. In connection with these, many financial market and financial product laws were revised technically to reflect the changes to the above mentioned acts.
|France||Implemented||MiFID II has been implemented into French law via (i) Ordonnance no 2016-827 of 23 June 2016 and Ordonnance no 2017-1107 of 22 June 2017 and (ii) Décrets (Decrees) no. 2017-1253 and no. 2017-1324.|
|Germany||Implemented||Has been implemented in full into German law via the Zweites Gesetz zur Novellierung von Finanzmarktvorschriften auf Grund europäischer Rechtsakte (Zweites Finanzmarktnovellierungsgesetz – 2. FiMaNog) dated 23 June 2017.|
|Greece||Not implemented||MiFID II has not yet been implemented in Greece. The relevant draft law was submitted for discussion before the Greek Parliament on 14 December 2017.|
|Italy||Partially implemented||Implementation is almost completed. The Italian Financial Act (Legislative Decree no. 58 of 1998) has been amended by Legislative Decree no. 129 of 3 August 2017 in order to implement the main provisions of MiFID II. The new provisions are effective as of 3 January 2018. In addition, Consob has launched and completed a series of consultations in relation to the adoption of the MiFID II’s level 2 measures such as passporting, conduct rules and investor protection. The final version of those MiFID II’s level 2 measures are expected to be enacted and published shortly. Other level 2 measures (such as those concerning market exchanges and trading venues) have already been implemented (e.g. by the adoption of the new Consob Regulation no. 20249 of 28 December 2017 on “Market Exchanges”).|
|Luxembourg||Partially implemented||Bill no. 7157 on markets in financial instruments has been submitted with the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies on 3 July 2017 in order to implement MiFID II into Luxembourg law, but has not yet been adopted. The Luxembourg Supervision Commission of the Financial Sector noted in its press release 17/47 (on the application of MiFID II/MiFIR in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg as of 3 January 2018) that irrespective of the fact that the new law has not been passed yet, the MiFIR provisions are binding and directly applicable in Luxembourg from 3 January 2018 by virtue of Article 288 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (except the provisions of Article 37 of MiFIR which shall apply from 3 January 2020). Furthermore, the more protective provisions of MiFID II which confer new rights or are more favourable than the applicable national rules and regulations shall also apply from 3 January 2018 and existing legal provisions shall be interpreted accordingly|
|Netherlands||Implemented||The Netherlands has implemented MiFID II via three separate laws that amend the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht) and ancillary laws. The laws became effective on 3 January 2018 and are listed below:
· Implementing Act MiFID II (Wet implementatie richtlijn markten voor financiele instrumenten 2014);
· Implementing Decree MiFID II (Besluit implementatie richtlijn markten voor financiele instrumenten 2014); and
· the Regulation competence employees investment firms (Regeling vakbekwaamheid medewerkers beleggingsondernemingen Wft).
|Norway||Partially implemented||New temporary regulations incorporating MiFID II and MiFIR entered into force as of 1 January 2018. Note that these are temporary regulations (level 2) and Norway is, as of 24 November 2018, still in a legislative process in respect of implementing MiFID II and MiFIR. The temporary regulations will be replaced at a later stage and the way it is implemented into Norwegian law will differ from the temporary regulations adopted so far.|
|Portugal||Implemented||MiFID II has been implemented in Portugal through Law no. 16/2015, of 24 February 2015, on collective investment schemes, Law no.18/2015, of 4 March 2015, on private equity firms, social entrepreneurship and specialized investment, and Decree-Law no. 124/2015, of 7 July 2015, amending the Portuguese Securities Code and the Legal Framework of Pension Funds. The new legislation has already come into force.
The CMVM is in regular contact with the compliance departments of the main market participants with respect to the importance of implementation. Full implementation of the Directive’s requirements by market participants remains a work in progress and CMVM are in email contact with smaller participants asking for status of implementation.
|Spain||Partially implemented||Spain has, since 30 December 2017, partially implemented MiFID II with regards to certain aspects on the legal regime of Spanish trading venues (regulated markets, MTFs and OTFs) through Royal Decree-Law 21/2017, of 29 December 2017, on urgent measures for the adaptation of Spanish law to the EU rules on securities markets.
Royal Decree-Law 21/2017 came into force on 3 January 2018. The remaining aspects of MiFID II have not been implemented as of 10 January 2018.
|Sweden||Implemented||Sweden has, as of 3 January 2018, implemented MiFID II by amending the Swedish Securities Markets Act, (Sw. Lag (2007:528) om Värdepappersmarknaden). The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority has issued new regulations to implement the delegated directive, Finansinspektionen’s regulations regarding investment services and activities (Sw. Finansinspektionens föreskrifter om värdepappersrörelse, FFFS 2017:2), which replaces the old FFFS 2007:16 with the same name.
The Swedish FSA also amended the Regulations governing operations on trading venues (Sw. Föreskrifter om verksamhet på marknadsplatser, FFFS 2007:17) to support the implementation of MiFIR. Both FSA regulations entered into force on 3 January 2018. Furthermore, the Swedish FSA has reported that it will comply with ESMA Guidelines and that it considers ESMA Guidelines as general guidelines.
|UK||Implemented||Implemented into UK law on 3 January 2018 through a variety of pieces of implementing legislation (see above).|
The above article is reproduced from the February 2018 edition of Exchange – International magazine. For more about financial services regulatory issues across the world, the full magazine is available for download here