avatar

Dr. Astrid Schnabel LL.M.

Author's details

Name: Dr. Astrid Schnabel LL.M.
Date registered: April 17, 2014

Latest posts

  1. Appointment of a Conciliation Committee dealing with the subject of a No Smoking Policy — December 6, 2018
  2. No co-determination rights of the works council for stock options issued by a foreign parent company — August 1, 2018
  3. Employer obligation to provide individual target agreements to safety authority — April 16, 2018
  4. Information right of the works council independent of employee consent — December 5, 2017
  5. Inadmissible evidence through installation of a keylogger — August 8, 2017

Author's posts listings

Appointment of a Conciliation Committee dealing with the subject of a No Smoking Policy

Under German law, works councils have so-called co-determination rights on certain subjects. This means that an employer must reach an agreement with the works council on these matters, such as rules and policies for employee conduct. Works council co-determination is, however, excluded if there are binding and final statutory provisions dealing with a certain matter. …

Continue reading »

No co-determination rights of the works council for stock options issued by a foreign parent company

In a judgment dated 3 August 2017, the Higher Regional Labour Court of Hessen has held that a works council’s co-determination rights do not extend to stock option plans by an employer’s foreign parent company (docket number 5 TaBV 23/17).   Under German law, works councils have a co-determination right regarding remuneration principles. In this …

Continue reading »

Employer obligation to provide individual target agreements to safety authority

Employers may be required to provide safety authorities with information on individual target agreements with their employees. In a judgment dated 28 February 2018, the Dusseldorf administrative court confirmed a corresponding order by the local safety authority (docket number 29 K 4191/16). In the case at hand, the employer offers consulting services. It is bound …

Continue reading »

Information right of the works council independent of employee consent

According to a recent judgment by the Higher Regional Labour Court in Munich (docket number 11 TaBV 36/17) of 27 September 2017, the works council is entitled to receive information regarding the existence of pregnant employees in the operation. In the case at hand, the employer had provided employees with a right to “opt out” …

Continue reading »

Inadmissible evidence through installation of a keylogger

Using a software keylogger may not always be much help in supporting a termination for cause, as a recent case before the Federal Labour Court shows (judgment dated 27 July 2017, docket number 2 AZR 681/16). The employee had worked for the employer since 2011. When opening up its network, the company informed employees that …

Continue reading »

Industrial action may take place in an employer’s parking lot

In a judgment dated 30 March 2017, the Higher Regional Labour Court Berlin-Brandenburg held that a trade union may take industrial action on an employer’s premises (docket number: 24 Sa 979/16). In this case, the trade union Ver.di had planned to picket in the company parking lot of a large online retailer. Its goal was …

Continue reading »

Works council’s request to dismiss an employee qualifies as an urgent operational reason for dismissal

Under German law, the works council can request that an employer dismisses or reassigns an employee if the employee has violated the law or has grossly violated principles set forth in sec. 75 of the Works Constitution Act, such as by showing racist or xenophobic behavior in the workplace. If the employer does not comply …

Continue reading »

Attendance premiums may set off minimum wage entitlement

Attendance premiums paid in addition to the hourly wage may be used to satisfy an employee’s minimum wage entitlement (judgment by the Higher Regional Labour Court Mecklenburg-Vorpommern dated 22 November 2016, docket number: 5 Sa 298/15). In the case at hand, the employee was entitled to a remuneration based on an hourly wage as well …

Continue reading »

No ice behind the steering wheel

The German Federal Labour Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht, BAG; docket no. 6 AZR 471/15) recently had to review a decision made by the Nuremberg Higher Labour Court (Landesarbeitsgericht, LAG; docket no. 7 Sa 124/15) that considered a first-time DUI violation not sufficient for an immediate termination of a truck driver’s employment contract. The Federal Labour Court considered …

Continue reading »

Failure of a public employer to invite a severely disabled individual to a job interview does not always indicate an unlawful discrimination

Sec. 82 sentence 2 of Volume IX of the German Social Code (SGB IX) states that if a severely disabled person has applied for a job with a public employer or they have been suggested by the Federal Labour Office (Bundesagentur für Arbeit), they must be invited to an interview. Failure to invite a severely …

Continue reading »

Older posts «